Team collaboration with Forge means everyone has their own AI-powered workflow, but tasks, decisions, and knowledge are shared. Scale Vibe Coding++โข across your entire team without losing the human orchestration that makes it work.
# One Forge instance, shared database# Central server: forge.company.com# Team members connect to shared instanceFORGE_URL=https://forge.company.com forge connect
Pros:
Single source of truth
Real-time collaboration
Shared task board
Cons:
Requires server setup
Network dependency
Potential conflicts
Best for: Distributed teams, async work
# Each team member runs local Forgenpx automagik-forge# Sync via GitHub/GitLab issuesforge config set sync.enabled trueforge config set sync.provider githubforge config set sync.repo org/project
# Product manager creates epicforge task create \ --title "EPIC: User notification system" \ --type epic \ --description "Real-time notifications with WebSocket, email, push" \ --assignee team \ --labels "epic,q4-2024"# Use AI to help break down epicforge task create \ --title "Break down notification epic into stories" \ --agent claude-code \ --description "Analyze epic, suggest user stories and technical tasks"
AI Output:
## Suggested User Stories1. **As a user**, I want to receive real-time notifications so I stay updated - Subtasks: WebSocket server, client connection, notification UI2. **As a user**, I want to configure notification preferences - Subtasks: Settings UI, preferences API, email opt-out3. **As a user**, I want notification history so I can review past alerts - Subtasks: History table, API endpoints, history UI## Technical Tasks- Design notification database schema- Set up WebSocket server infrastructure- Create notification service- Build notification UI components- Write integration tests
# Alice (driver) and Bob (navigator) pair on auth feature# Alice creates taskforge task create \ --title "Implement OAuth2 login flow" \ --assignee alice,bob \ --agent claude-code# Alice codes with AI agent help# Bob reviews in real-time# AI agent (Claude) implements based on conversation# Bob creates parallel security review taskforge task create \ --title "Security review: OAuth implementation" \ --agent security-reviewer \ --depends-on AUTH-01# At end of session, both human review and AI review complete
# Rotate driver every 15 minutes# All developers contribute to prompt# Multiple agents work on different aspects# Agent 1: Implementation (Claude)forge task start AUTH-01 --agent claude-code# Agent 2: Test generation (Cursor)forge task create --title "Tests for AUTH-01" --agent cursor-cli# Agent 3: Documentation (Gemini)forge task create --title "Document AUTH-01" --agent gemini# Team reviews all outputs together
# Alice pushes PR before EODgh pr create --title "OAuth login implementation"# Automated review startsforge review create --pr 200 \ --agents claude-code,gemini \ --post-results# Morning: Bob sees review results# Bob addresses issues# Alice reviews when back online# Async but efficient - no waiting
# Generate retro insightsforge retrospective --sprint 24# AI-generated insights:## โ What went well:# - 95% of tasks completed on time# - No production bugs from sprint# - Effective use of Claude for complex backend tasks## โ ๏ธ What could improve:# - 3 tasks blocked by unclear requirements# - 2 merge conflicts (better coordination needed)# - Some agents underutilized (GPT-4 Codex only 5%)## ๐ก Action items:# - Define clearer acceptance criteria upfront# - Daily sync on overlapping work# - Experiment with GPT-4 Codex for specific tasks
# Lock task when starting workforge task lock AUTH-01 --developer alice# If Bob tries to work on it:# โ ๏ธ Task AUTH-01 is locked by alice (started 2h ago)# Suggest: Coordinate with alice or pick different task# Unlock when doneforge task unlock AUTH-01
Remember: Vibe Coding++โข scales when teams maintain human orchestration. AI agents amplify each individualโs productivity, but humans coordinate, decide, and own the architecture and outcomes.